The Federal government has continued its remarkable record of underestimating revenue by upgrading the 2006-07 budget surplus forecast from $10.8 billion to $11.8 billion despite downgrading forecast economic growth from 3.25% to 2.5%.
Booming commodity prices and a record company tax take have once again underpinned the surplus but economists remain amazed at Treasury’s apparent deliberate underestimation of revenue.
Economic growth is the biggest driver of revenue so if you get growth forecasts right, you should revenue right as well.
Based on Peter Costello’s record over the past decade, it looks like Treasury has deliberately understated revenue by about $4 billion a year. An unexpected $1.5 billion in income tax drove the better outcome.
Even when growth falls 0.75 percentage points short, the forecast surplus is still conservative to the tune of $1 billion, meaning Australia is headed for its third biggest surplus ever in 2006-07 and will finally have a positive net worth by 2008-09.
The following table pulls together the entire budget forecasting record over the Howard and Costello years, including the original forecast in May before a financial year commences, the mid-year update shortly before Christmas, the next year’s forecast when there are only seven weeks of a financial year to go, and then the final outcome:
Year | Budget | Mid-year update | Next Budget | Outcome | Forecasting error |
1996-97 | -5.65bn | not done | -6.89bn | -$5.28bn | +$370m |
1997-98 | -3.85bn | -$2.75bn | -$1.1bn | $1.17bn | +$5.02bn |
1998-99 | $2.69bn | $3.27bn | $2.88bn | $4.34bn | +$1.65bn |
1999-00 | $5.21bn | $2.69bn | $7.79bn | $13.06bn | +$7.85bn |
2000-01 | $2.84bn | $4.33bn | $2.25bn | $5.97bn | +$3.13bn |
2001-02 | $1.52bn | $0.5bn | -1.19bn | -$1.06bn | -$2.58bn |
2002-03 | $2.09bn | $2.14bn | $3.92bn | $7.48bn | +$5.39bn |
2003-04 | $3.66bn | $4.64bn | $4.59bn | $8.04bn | +$4.38bn |
2004-05 | $2.39bn | $6.21bn | $9.23bn | $13.62bn | +$11.23bn |
2005-06 | $8.92bn | $11.5bn | $14.8bn | $15.8bn | +$6.88bn |
2006-07 | $10.8bn | $11.8bn | to come | to come | + $1 bn |
Average | $2.78bn | $3.61bn | $3.63bn | $5.36bn | +$4.33bn |
As you can see, Treasury’s credibility as a forecaster is pretty ordinary, but this has suited the government’s political agenda. The question now is whether this deliberately conservative approach can be sustained or whether changes will be made in Treasury.
Whatever the case, both Labor and the Coalition have almost $12 billion to spend so stand back for another pre-election spending spree, despite the drought and slowing economic growth.
Peter Costello has just had a 50 minute press conference covering a raft of topics, so expect the detail of these budget figures to be mixed in with various other stories such as Qantas, AWB and Pink’s criticism of our sheep farmers.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.