It’s a rare day in Australia’s political media, but following Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott’s health care slug-fest yesterday, the pundits appear to be of one mind: a unanimous victory to Rudd.
On Crikey‘s The Stump blog, Canberra correspondent Bernard Keane says it was a double victory for Rampaging Rudd and camp ALP:
Health and health funding has remained the dominant political issue, and Rudd easily outpointed Abbott in the debate by staying positive, appealing to bipartisanship and emphasising attractive themes like the impact on families.
But, as he pointed out in yesterday’s Crikey Daily Mail, the debate is likely to have very little impact on the Federal election itself:
So this debate, in the middle of the day, months away from an election when voters aren’t paying the slightest bit of attention, will have virtually no impact.
Meanwhile, at our health blog Croakey, the health commentariat seem to agree that, regardless of who won, the big loser was anyone looking for actual health policy discussion.
Yet regardless of the no-brainer win for Rudd, every punter and his dog has weighed-in this morning.
Was it a KO for the PM, or was the bout fixed before the pair even entered the ring? Was Abbott left flat on the canvas, or will he be back to fight another day? And then there’s the worm…
Here’s how they’re calling it this morning:
The Australian
Paul Kelly: Rudd skates home with sweet reason
Abbott threw lots of punches but he still let Rudd off too lightly.
Samantha Maiden: Nothing arouses like motherhood
Abbott was starting to look like a big-eared lout who hadn’t done his homework, up against Harry Potter.
Mark Cresswell: Primary care was big loser in debate
Neither side had anything new to offer for mental health, or aged care, or dental health.
Sydney Morning Herald
Peter Hartcher: Abbott was the north wind and Rudd was the sun
… [Abbott] came across as unreasonable and sometimes undergraduate.
Julie Robotham: Jaded election year jousting rather than true debate on health
It left precious little time and space to address current and future issues concerning publicly-funded health care.
The Age
Michelle Grattan: Yawning policy gap lets leader down
Little that was new came out.
Pater Hartcher: Worm tales: negativity works against Abbott
Australian voters prefer a can-do problem-solver in their leaders to a naysayer
Shaun Carney: Abbott’s health attack went down like an iron kite
One of Rudd’s natural advantages, a corollary of his workaholic ways, is to be able to memorise the detail, so he didn’t slip up.
Daily Telegraph
Malcolm Farr: Australia sick of all talk and no action on hospitals
It was a political ambush, and it worked.
Piers Akerman: The great debate was anything but
Rudd’s specialty is superficiality. Spin not substance, and that is what he delivered.
Courier Mail
Dennis Atkins: Abbott allows ‘nice’ Kevin onto high ground
The question for the Opposition is whether this was just a bad day for Abbott or a sign of his limitation.
Herald Sun
Andrew Bolt: Kevin Rudd’s runaway win opens a can of worms for lacklustre Tony Abbott
Rudd won, if only in the battle of temporary perceptions.
Phillip Hudson: Kevin Rudd wins round one of health debate
Just turning up to the debate on time and not falling over means Abbott gains from being given equal billing with the PM
Adelaide Advertiser
Mark Kenny: Rudd steps out on a limb – and stays balanced
It was actually a clever move from the PM suggesting he is every bit as wily as the man he replaced, John Howard.
ABC
Barrie Cassidy: Positivity the best policy as Rudd tweets ahead
Kevin Rudd looked like a prime minister and Tony Abbott behaved like an opposition leader
Tim Dunlop: Substance trumps speedos
… an unequivocal disaster for Tony Abbott.
Elsewhere…
New Matilda, Ben Eltham: Abbott the brawler struggles in debate
Style versus substance. Confrontation versus diplomacy. Plain talking versus grasp of detail.
Trevor Cook: Not even close: Rudd trounces Abbott in health debate
Abbott’s so-called great debating skills amount to nothing more than a sneer and a shout from a schoolyard bully.
The Punch, Paul Colgan: Rudd’s gamble pays off
Abbott didn’t show up today looking for consensus or solutions. He came, as is his instinct, looking for a fight.
The Piping Shrike: Who does negative better?
[Rudd] was wrapping up in positive vibes an anti-political attack that is at the heart of the health debate.
Grog’s Gamut: The health debate — Kevin grins, Abbott grits and journalists talk
If Abbott doesn’t know the difference between being a leader and being a Minister, he should know it now.
The Political Sword, Ad astra: Comprehending the Great Big New Health Debate
Federal politics changed ominously for the Coalition today.
Parton Words, Mark Parton: The worm
Kevin could have farted three times in quickfire succession and then given a cheeky grin. The worm would have gone through the roof.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.