Prime Minister Rudd has been imploring the states to “act in the national interest and in the interests of working families …” That’s his good cop. As bad cop, he’s threatening a referendum on health reform. Yes, we all remember how fond the public are of those.

A referendum. Really?

Let’s consult the Herald Sun‘s latest “Matters of State” — a study guide (or “VCE study boost”) for Year 12 students. Today’s subject: legal studies. The topic — a possible referendum. Jules Aldous, from Shelford Girls’ Grammar, writes:

If the referendum relates to a complex issue, voters may not understand it and vote against it.

Alternatively, voters may not understand the actual referendum process. In either case, a no may be cast to maintain the status quo.

It is also suggested that some voters are sceptical of politicians who want to change our Constitution. These voters may perceive that the referendum is a way for politicians to increase their power.

The Government has stated that if they hold a referendum, it will be either before or at the next election.

The timing of a referendum may influence its success. Some suggest that referendums held at the same time as an election generate less interest.

Voters may confuse the purpose of a referendum with the purpose of a vote in an election. Some voters will vote according to the views of their political party.

This is an issue to follow throughout the year and it’s important to read newspaper reports.

Wise words for any student of politics.