As predicted, the hand-wringing and appeals for yet more money have begun on the back of a performance way below expectations at the London Olympics. Besides yet more public money, one suggestion is to broaden the pool of potential “talent” by making all kids engage in sport at school. Putting aside the question of time, training and facilities in an already overcrowded curricula — is a sporting boot camp at school the answer to our golden woes?
Without a doubt, kids (and we bigger ones) need to engage in more physical activity. But that desperate need for more activity to address our sedentary lifestyle and maintain fitness does not need organised, competitive sport. In fact, compulsory sport is probably the worst thing we can force on all kids if we really want a healthy Australia.
The distinction between sport and play is profound. Sport is a special activity that is defined by the assumption that everyone plays by the same rules (but pushes them to the limit), has a time limit or time measurement component, and there is a winner and a loser. Modern sport has also become a commercial activity — money buys victory and victory begets more money in terms of sponsorship, advertising, marketing and gate revenue. The money also breeds corruption and cheating and absurd outcomes such as a football club’s share price going up after a match-fixing scandal.
The ugly side of sport makes it a poor medium to encourage more activity. The win-at-all costs mentality, characterised by the sense of failure felt by athletes who won “only” silver (you are the second best on the planet — and you feel the need to apologise?) is not the message our kids should learn. School already has constant competitive testing — do we really need to make kids feel they are being trialled in sport as well?
The increasing complexity and difficulty of sport means that to become an elite, kids have to train for hours on end, week after week, with parents ferrying from training, to game, to carnival and back. Some children train and compete for up to 40 hours per week, plus school and sleep. Leaving little time for actually living. Over-training is a serious problem for kids — pushed by parents, coaches and that perception in Australia that sporting success is the only thing we value.
Sport is a misogynist activity — women are consistently belittled or ignored for their sporting achievements. Witness the infantilsing use of “girl” to refer to so many of our Olympic women, followed in the next breath by oohs and ahhs because they are a mother and can find the time to train.
Many kids don’t want to play sport and may be ill-suited to the specialised demands of rules and conflict. For every kid picked first, there is another picked last — with all the social stigma that attaches.
We need kids to be more playful — exploring their world without rules, time limits and arbitrary “winners”. Physical activity is about movement and the child becoming comfortable with how they move — not being trained into a specific way of running, jumping or throwing. Bring on more physical activity at school — but not as a way of training and trialling future medallists.
If kids want to play sport, then make that easy — give the struggling and desperately poor grassroots of the sporting world the largesse lavished on the top. Then some kids might flow through to gold — but if they don’t, does it really matter?
Activity is what is needed, not every school as a training and testing lab.
Most kids who play sport never come close to elite level, so the comments made regarding the commercial side of sports, the demands on time etc really apply to a VERY small number. I think that we are missing an important point and here, there is no mention of the advantages of being part of a team, the important of commitments to a team, playing to a set of rules, accepting defeat, celebrating victory, the buzz that one gets from taking part in sports. These are the reasons why I strongly encourage both my kids (who are not the “sporty” type, but none the less get a kick out of competing) to play one sport in a team each term.
So sports are misogynistic? I am not convinced that referring to “girls” is a strong argument. How about the “boys” in rugby league. In fact in most male sports the men call themselves “the boys” at post match interviews…..
Coz, you missed the point.
Schools are about other things than training athletic automatoms.
If I had my way, I would outlaw most team and all contact sports in schools. As a life skill, being familiar with fitness equipment in gyms and how to use it is probably the single most valuable objective, yet most schools spend far more on buses to cart kids passively to and from team sports venues than they spend on gym equipment.
IMHO the sports curriculum of schools appears to be designed to try to produce “stars” so that the staff can bask in the reflected glory which eluded them when they were at school.
I too have encouraged my children to play sports, for the reasons that COZ mentions. However, over the last 10 years that we have been involved, it has turned at that it is also a bit of a life lesson. In sports they learn how less-than-competent umpires will always favour the winning side. They see how ugly and cruel people can be by witnessing parents with no sense of self, scream, threaten and hurl abuse at CHILDREN because they are losing. Its also a great look at corruption. How the club secretary and president et al will ensure their kids are placed in a team with their friends and/or the better players, and if they are part of the association, make sure their children are in a division that ensures they will win most, or every game. The other kids …. what ever… It also gives them a good, close up look at sports stars. In our experience, they are often selfish, arrogant, insincere and unintelligent. Yes, playing sports is important, but I love my children too much to want more of it for them.
Wow – so many sweeping generalisations in one article! We have elites, misogynists, over-training, corruption, cheating, and on and on.
….and here was I thinking my youngest DAUGHTER loved athletics because of the competition, and mateship, and promise of achievement in return for effort. Silly me. It’s a miracle she got through little athletics where everyone is encouraged to participate no matter of race or gender or social class or anything else apart from the willingness to muck in with the others and have a go. Come to think of it – the fact that most of the adults helping out were men does indicate a subversive misogyny (plus I’m sure some of the time-keeping was a bit suss – what with using plain old stop watches to record a time). What’s more the results usually ended with a winner, and a lot of non-winners! As for the coaching and training – well that just proves an insidious agenda of conformism and elitism. Little Johnny should be left to run like a turtle instead of like a hare because it might hurt his self esteem to be taught how to run faster. I suspect there would also be fewer upset little boys and girls if they automatically passed their grades at school? Not good for Johnny to fail at anything. Imagine the stigma attached to being held back in year 5 and having to shave before class?
Pfft – go back to research Dr Connor and leave the kids and their parents and the schools to participate and strive for success while you ponder what it all means.
Let’s put in more money so the Gosper Children are looked after properly.