Sure, it’s a small issue in the scheme of things, but it’s something that’s been bugging us lately. Shouldn’t a Rhodes Scholar know the difference between which and that? Isn’t the Prime Minister setting a bad example for schoolkids when he utters grammatically incorrect sentences, every day, on national television?
You might have noticed, too, that Tony Abbott has a “which” problem: he regularly uses which when he should use that.
The pedants among you will know that “which” takes a comma, and you use it in a non-restrictive clause, i.e. a clause where you are adding extra information, but you could understand the meaning of the sentence without it. “That” does not take a comma, and you use it when you are adding information that is crucial to the understanding of the sentence.
Here’s an example of correct usage:
“Tony Abbott chose to be photographed in front of a sexist sign about Australia’s first female prime minister. The stunt, which was deeply offensive, should have cost him his job.”
“Tony Abbott chose to be photographed in front of a sexist sign about Australia’s first female prime minister. Shouldn’t a stunt that was deeply offensive to 50% of voters have cost him his job?”
It’s time for Tony to ditch the which.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.