On the Bennelong byelection
Kenneth Piaggio writes: Re. “Poll Bludger: what just happened in Bennelong?“(Monday)
“By the historic standards of federal byelections, the 5% swing against the Liberals in Bennelong on Saturday lands almost exactly in the middle of the range”.
Historically, byelections do not have a sitting member contesting their seat as an endorsed candidate of their original party. There is no historical equivalent to a byelection being required because of a technicality — the dual citizenship issue — which seems to leave a degree of voter sympathy and understanding. It seems to me, in this context, a swing of 5% is highly significant. I do not think the current Government can receive any comfort from this result.
Peter Wileman writes: Re. “Poll Bludger: what just happened in Bennelong?“(Monday)
It hasn’t taken them long, post Bennelong, to institute cuts to education and social services. What part of “democracy” do they not understand? “Demos:” The people. Not the parasitic multinationals, or the dishonest banks.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.