data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91746/9174696735a9fc84becec9fdd2a1f4f9aa960b6e" alt=""
Surely Sydney will leave lockdown by the end of the current quarter — that is, the end of September?
If not, that would mean Australia’s biggest economic centre had been shuttered for 90 days and counting.
But with the numbers not shifting in Sydney after nearly six weeks of lockdown, and Gladys Berejiklian both admitting that the numbers had yet to peak and walking back her commitment to get Year 12 students back into the class room, the idea of negative first quarter for 2021-22 followed by another sprightly bounce-back is now looking shaky.
In fact Berejiklian seems to have given up on lockdown by itself driving cases back to zero, and is relying instead on vaccination to reach critical mass, despite the continuing lack of Pfizer supplies.
But that creates a devilish problem because, as all the modelling including the federal government’s own shows, even with 70% of eligible people vaccinated, we can still expect large case numbers, hospitalisations and deaths. And a well-vaccinated NSW with high case numbers is going to remain locked off from the rest of the country until they catch up, probably sometime in 2022.
That’s why the entire economy may end up paying a steep price for Berejiklian’s failure to lock down quickly enough and hard enough. Whatever her motives or “advice from the experts”, we now face the real prospect of Sydney dragging growth down into the September quarter. Thus we’re into “technical recession” territory.
For the moment, everyone’s assuming that the lockdown in south-eastern Queensland will be of far briefer duration — brought on by an alarmingly mysterious outbreak — but it looks certain to be extended beyond the weekend. Having gone quicker and harder than Berejiklian, Queensland is unlikely to do more than mildly exacerbate the contraction this quarter.
The first recession last year — our first in three decades — was unavoidable, and the Morrison government’s response, if at times untargeted, was strong and effective. But another recession will have been very, very avoidable, but for failures of leadership at both the state and federal level over the vaccination rollout, quarantine and decisions to lock down.
The Reserve Bank is unfazed, having declined this week to alter its position to begin slowly tapering its quantitative easing measures from September. But it meets again next month and can adjust its position at that meeting if it needs to. It retains its belief — based on the 2020 experience — that things will bounce back to the strong recovery we were enjoying before the Delta variant hit. It releases its latest economic forecasts tomorrow in the third Statement on Monetary Policy for the year. What were expected to be slightly higher forecasts for inflation and growth looking into 2022 and 2023 may not survive the obvious worsening of the situation in Sydney and southeast Queensland.
Business is already seeing the impact. Sydney-based furniture retailer Nick Scali told the ASX on Thursday morning that “trading during July 2021 was impacted by government mandated lockdowns in Greater Sydney, Victoria and South Australia, and written sales orders were down 27% compared to July 2020”. Sales still well up on July 2019, suggesting Australians are channelling cash freed up by travel restrictions and lockdowns into their homes, but it points to how much damage the current lockdowns will do.
As we’re discovering with Delta, however, what applied last year doesn’t necessarily apply this year. The next recovery — whether from a recession or simply a bad quarter — will occur as we start transitioning to “living with COVID”. It will occur during the run-up to a federal election, and as the federal government considers reopening borders, allowing much greater numbers of temporary workers back in. And in the face of a real threat of new lockdowns.
The federal government was already forecasting tipping over $100 billion of deficit spending into the economy this year, a bill that will be substantially expanded by the lockdown assistance it is currently providing and, likely, will continue providing for some weeks — far more than it will pick up from the iron ore price peak that would have juiced its tax receipts. It still has plenty of fiscal ammunition left if need be — thought it will be strongly tempted to pump it all into marginal seats given the looming election.
Our pandemic experience so far has been all about the intersection of health issues, economic concerns and political agendas. What no one seems to have worked out yet is how “living with COVID” in an election context turbocharges all three of those. Unless Berejiklian can get on top of the Sydney outbreak quickly, a recession is going to complicate all those matters enormously.
Covid has been a godsend to the ugly
It means the AFP have been sitting on advice on whether or not to charge Bruce Lehrmann since the 28th of June which is over a month ago but last week AFP commissioner, Reece Kershaw, and the home affairs minister, Karen Andrews, were telling the media lies that the decision whether to charge Bruce Lehrmann was still with the ACT director of public prosecutions.
In the last couple of weeks, AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw has sent a letter, which was drafted by Scott Morrison, to federal politicians warning sexual assault victims, such as Brittany Higgins, that they need to go to the police and not the media. And NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller stated that rape allegations by Katharine Thornton against Attorney-General Christian Porter “probably would not have gone to court” even though the police had not even investigated the matter. When looking at the conduct and communication of both AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw and NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller in relation to the 2 alleged rapes it is obvious there has been political interference by Scott Morrison and his office.
Why would any one go to the police , given the apparent deliberate lack of action on current cases?
Always been the way
Victims with information about sexual assault need to go to the police, but politicians with information about sexual assault can do what they like.
I’m really not sure why NSW is still persisting with a “half measures” approach. The focus on vaccines feels like a gambit to put the lockdown as a consequence of federal inaction* rather than taking the actions necessary to get it down to zero and lift it.
For those of us on the periphery of the outbreak, it feels like we’re just waiting for the inevitable bad news of the virus escaping and shutting things down. Today it’s Newcastle’s turn. Who knows what it’ll be tomorrow or next week or next month as this thing drags on…
* Prima facie it seems to have worked into getting NSW ~250,000 extra vaccines if the ABC feed is to believed.
The extra vaccines are being provided by the regions, confiscated for use by Sydneysiders, from what I’ve read.
Marcia and Kel – can you please stop interrupting Allan’s train of thought.
How kind of you
Who is Allan?
Asked the blind man
That is the case here in the largest town in Central NSW – the staffer who cancelled our 2nd dose, booked in early June for Sept. confirmed, sotto voce, that there an implied threat that if the redirection to the priority area – aka Sydney – became known it could cause panic and supplies would not be guaranteed, later.
Not sure what half measures you speak of Kel. Are you suggesting curfews? I can confidently say they would have zero effect, given that there is basically nobody out after 8.00 pm anyway except for health workers, cleaners, drivers and Uber eats/ menulog drivers. What other measures would you like? Don’t get too caught up in what is being reported in the media. What I’m seeing on the ground is substantial lockdown apart from exercise, and the mental health aspects of that are significant.
No jogging would be sweet for me, they seem to think running up behind you and right next to you is fine, everyone else is doing the right thing.
I’m not suggesting anything. I’ve seeing from epidemiologists that the measures are inadequate, who have suggested multiple ways in which the lockdown could be more comprehensive to prevent spread. From memory, I don’t remember anyone suggesting curfews. I have seen suggestions about distance one can travel from home, the criteria for locking LGAs down, and being more forceful on what counts as essential work.
In any case, it’s hard to suggest that the measures taken were sufficient seeing as the numbers are still going up.
@Dog’s Breakfast Maybe Kel was thinking back to the heady days when the Premier of the “Gold Standard” state was saying something along the lines of “Oh, I wouldn’t want to burden the people in the eastern suburbs with a real lockdown”
And Scottie from marketing chimed in with “NSW can get on top of this outbreak without a lockdown”..
The disaster that is the gold standard of Shredder Gladdy Killer
Newcastle and Hunter residents who had their Covid vaccine appointments cancelled so doses could be redirected to school students in Sydney are furious as they are left unvaccinated and in lockdown as the virus spreads to their region. John Barilaro, welcomed the accelerated doses for the regions to make up for those redirected to vaccinate about 20,000 year 12 students and thanked the government for responding to his “pleas” – days after he justified the redirection on Tuesday as being “the turn of the bush to repay the favour” for drought and bushfire assistance.
Residents reported anger at being left unvaccinated as Covid spread around them.
Cherie Quinn, who lives in Charlestown, a suburb about 10km from Newcastle’s CBD, had an appointment for her first dose of Pfizer vaccine booked for Tuesday this week, but it was cancelled after the redirection policy was announced. Her husband’s appointment was also cancelled.
“I’m a bit over being told to get vaccinated,” Lowe told Guardian Australia. “I’ve tried multiple times and will take anything but at present it’s not any hesitancy I’m afraid but only viewed as pure gaslighting.”
On the Central Coast, residents were critical of the decision to redirect their Pfizer doses given they were also subject to the greater Sydney lockdown.
The virus will always pop up again, no matter how many lockdowns, no matter how hard or how easy.
Everybody could be isolated into an individual cryogenic chamber for the next five years, but the virus would still return.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say there. Are you questioning whether a short sharp lockdown is the same as a long one (evidently false), or are you suggesting that lockdowns are a distraction and we should just let the virus rip and rack up a sizeable body count?
In terms of short sharp lockdowns, we see the numbers getting COVID far lower and a far quicker return to “normalcy” than a long lockdown. My bet is Victoria will return to relative normalcy with a far lower body count than the current NSW outbreak that’s been going on since late June.
In terms of lockdowns vs no lockdowns, we see all over the world what that means. The people catching COVID increases greatly, more people get gravely sick to the point they need hospitalisation, many of those people will die, and and many of those who recover will suffer long terms symptoms because of it.
So it comes down to what you prefer – the inconvenience for a few weeks of needing to isolate, or living normally but with a large body count, overwhelmed hospital system, mass suffering of many, and long terms effects of the virus throughout the wider population. Which is it?
I’m definitely not into the ‘rip’ scenario.
A lockdown is not an inconvenience. It is a gut wrenching mental torture and life depleting experience for many.
I do not buy into ‘long term effects’ of Covid yet, this is the loud protestations of a few, from what I can tell, it will take me until about the middle of next year to have a formed position.
I work for an American company, more than 20 people I work with closely have had Covid, and being in the USA they have family, friends, associates, etc who have had Covid. Of the almost 30 Million Americans who had Covid, ‘long Covid’ is still largely mythical. I am not saying it’s not real.
My concern is that lockdowns, closed borders, no international travel, 4 reasons to leave the home, are a permanent part of Australian life now. And I mean permanent in the real sense.
Our labor state politicians ‘sniff’ a victory and we will be thrown to the wolves to achieve it.
So, if lockdowns are “a gut wrenching mental torture and life depleting experience”, and “I’m definitely not into the ‘rip’ scenario”, what alternative is there? Because there’s not a lot of options now – it’s either contain the virus or the virus will spread throughout the population. And at present, lockdowns are the only real measure we have – at least until the vaccination rate is much higher than it is now. This is something that both epidemiologists are saying, and that the federal and state governments are endorsing.
I don’t think anyone is denying that lockdowns are terrible and they are to be avoided, but that it’s taken as the most expedient political decision given the available alternatives. So, what do you see as the alternative that the governments are missing?
“I do not buy into ‘long term effects’ of Covid yet”
Really?! So all those studies that look at the damage COVID does to survivors, or the studies of trailing symptoms – you think the scientists are making it up??
“Our labor state politicians ‘sniff’ a victory and we will be thrown to the wolves to achieve it.”
Seems strange to single out Labor state politicians when :Liberal state politicians are also using it, and the Liberal federal government has endorsed lockdown as the only solution. I even remember the Victorian opposition come out in support of the last lockdown after initially opposing it.
The numbers that apparently justify conventional economic analysis that the overall the economy is surprisingly ‘good’ is evidence of how irrelevant conventional economic theory and ideology is to real humans. Immune big business is voraciously absorbing small business under pressure, largely by just watching them die. This not going well for society.
I can see why ScumBag wanted to skimp on the initial vaccine order (buy cheap, buy twice), choosing to give Pfizer a miss the first time round. After all, he has great instincts for self-preservation and no one needs to remind him that the more taxpayers’ money he can spaff away on rorts, lurks, perks, featherbedding and porkbarreling the better his prospects for re-election despite his venality, lack of empathy, maladroitness, tone-deafness and, last but not least, incompetence.
https://covidlive.com.au/nsw
1532 cases this week, Gold standard
And now to top it off . . . Victoria now in lockdown from 8pm this evening.
That school was the epicentre last year with the ignoring of the public health measures in preference of observing religious customs.