data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cace0/cace06a7d8fe9d22f4bc941e1618f92821cebd67" alt="Jenny West during the inquiry into John Barilaro's NY trade role (Image: AAP/Bianca De Marchi)"
We don’t often get to hear from the victims of political expediency, but this week we did, in spades, from a former senior bureaucrat who was done over and left for dead as John Barilaro pursued what he considered his: a fabulous, $500,000-a-year gig in New York, paid by the taxpayer.
This particular example played out in NSW. But the story of Jenny West, who was barrelled aside to sate the desires of the former NSW deputy premier, is the story of anyone — public servant or otherwise — who ever believed in a fair process only for that belief to be shattered by the degraded behaviour of the political class.
We witnessed it by the bucket load under the previous Coalition government, which turned the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) into a frat house for Liberal Party cronies all supported on the public dime.
For every job gifted to a political mate, there are good people who suffer. In the case of the AAT, highly credentialled professionals saw their careers terminated simply because a space was needed for a political friend. Then there are those dedicated souls, fired by the desire to perform public service, who put their hat in the ring for an AAT role in the quaint belief, fostered by the government itself, that their application would be assessed on merit.
Crikey has spoken to these people in the past, nearly always off the record. They are rueful and disillusioned by how brutally they have been treated. But rarely if ever will they speak about it. Why? Because it is degrading and humiliating. They fear reprisals. Speaking up also casts people as whingers. And who would ever employ a whinger?
The term “moral injury” is normally applied to military contexts, but it works in these contexts too. It captures the core of the hurt: you believed in the system, but it betrayed you and your mission.
The term might have been invented for Jenny West, the one-time deputy secretary of Investment NSW. She specialised in global trade and thought she might have a crack at a trade job in New York. Here’s how the events have unfolded, as revealed in hearings of an upper house inquiry into how John Barilaro ended up with the job salaried at half a million dollars.
In April 2021, Investment NSW advertised the job. Interviews were conducted in July, following an independent process. In August, Jenny West was told she was the preferred candidate. Her boss, Amy Brown, congratulated her and sent her a signed note from then-premier Gladys Berejiklian. Contract terms were quickly agreed. But then in September, Brown invites West for the dreaded “beach walk” where she imparts the news that the job might not be so certain after all. By October 1, it was all over, as was West’s career as a senior NSW public servant.
Three days later, Barilaro quit Parliament. Just more than three months later, he applied for and was ultimately selected for the New York post.
Like many who have been done over by self-interested politicians, West had resolved to keep the hurt to herself and to suck it up. She never wanted any of this to become public. No one likes a complainer. It’s an unspoken system that keeps political abuses of power going.
This week, however, West was forced into giving public evidence, thus becoming an unwilling whistleblower on the system. West spoke of her distress at the turn of events. She was “extremely upset” at having the job taken away from her. She was “trying to move on” from a “disappointing episode”.
She also used a revealing phrase to describe the chain of events that saw her stripped of a role that was rightly hers. “I couldn’t get my head around how a process could be stopped midway and then to be told that I’d lost my existing job. To be honest, I couldn’t get my head around that,” she told the upper house inquiry.
Then there was her fear for the future.
“I’ve worked exceptionally hard for my career over the years and I’m a very professional person that works because I enjoy it,” she said. “I love working with people. I love building great teams. So I was quite horrified by what [her boss, Amy Brown] said, because it is so different from who I am.”
“And I would hope, in the future, an organisation will take me for who I am and see the truth,” she added.
Crikey contacted two people interviewed for the job originally set for Jenny West, seeking their views on the process that had delivered Barilaro his plum job. One, Peter Hendy, is a former Liberal politician. The other, Rob Fitzpatrick, is a director of the Meat and Livestock Association (MLA). Hendy said he had no comment. We have not heard back from Fitzpatrick, who we tried to contact through the MLA. But really, who would blame them?
Jenny West found herself ultimately friendless in the bureaucracy. Having warmly endorsed her, Amy Brown later found reasons to doubt her former trusted colleague as the political winds shifted. Attempting to raise the alarm on the process, West also contacted her “one-up” boss, the head of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, Michael Coutts-Trotter, but to no avail.
Ultimately West was bundled out of the public service altogether under a “no cause” termination and given a statutory 38-week payout — a handy sum, no doubt, but does it balance out the betrayal?
It has been reported that the NSW ICAC is now looking into the Barilaro saga. Is it a case of corruption? Maybe it is. Maybe it isn’t.
It is though, unquestionably, indecent. As yet there has been no apology from Premier Dominic Perrottet. But then again, there has never been any contrition from federal Coalition politicians either, for the careers and hopes of good people that were destroyed on an enormous scale when the former government stacked boards and tribunals with political cronies.
Jenny West’s story sheds light on one of the hidden costs of a politically corrupted process — and it should be widely heeded.
The stitch-up was complete when West was told her current job was now redundant. Under NSW PS rules, a person made redundant cannot apply for another PS job for 9 months, thus disqualifying West from applying again when the NY job was readvertised.
And then the job from which she had been made redundant was advertised with a different title and terms of reference.
A conspiracy in every way.
Something else emerged during Ms West’s evidence at the inquiry that again exposes the conspiracy to corrupt process. It was revealed at the inquiry that in the Candidate’s Package given to applicants for the NY job, that tertiary qualifications were essential. Ms West has a Bachelor of Economics and a Masters in International Business Administration. Barilaro has a Cert IV in Building and Construction from the Housing Industry Association, and Michael West reports other developments on his CV. https://michaelwest.com.au/barilaro-padded-resume-in-advance-of-new-york-gig/
Love the last line re ICAC. I hope Jenny West gets justice somewhere along the line. She certainly deserves it. And I hope the plotters get their justice also.
And that raises another question worthy of serious exploration: how many contracted public servants are terminated each year without a reason being given and at what cost to the public purse? As far as I know, there is no real scrutiny of this practice.
It’s simply easier all round to use Redundancy. It enables you to get rid of the deadwood and troublemakers without going through all the endless performance management first. The general rule everywhere is that you FIFO. I would welcome a study on the differences in total costs of both scenarios.
It’s a disgrace and rarely reported on- I have a close friend who sat in an office for months, surrounded by senior staff, all with little to do and waiting for redundancies because some pointless political rebranding was occurring. Disgusting.
Why is there any ‘maybe’ about this? It bloody stinks.
And as for the AAT… a long walk off a short plank for every grifting saboteur the Lying Nasty Party appointed.
It’s a ‘maybe’ for the fairly obvious reason that the laws concerning corruption are drafted and passed by politicians who want as much room as possible to enjoy the perks and privileges of power, share it with their mates, use the influence of patronage and buy votes in marginal seats with taxpayers’ cash. ‘It stinks’ does not make it illegal.
Sad but true.
If nothing else, hopefully this sorry saga makes it more difficult in the future for politicians to “look after” their mates. I’m betting it won’t stop them altogether, but it may limit the amount of mutual back-scratching on the public dime.
It’s gotten well beyond back-scratching – it’s handjobs all round with bonus taxpayer turkeyslaps.
Indeed. The term I’d really like to use would be “circle jerk”, though I’m trying hard not to be vulgar even when the situation clearly warrants it.
Incidentally, circle jerk is my nomination for a collective noun of politicians.
That is highly complimentary in comparison with what I would call them.
Was this really a job one had to do work for? Or was it just a job in name only for a certain person to simply flit around in America and “get paid”. How terrible if Ms West had actually got “the job”, gone to NY and found out the truth about “the job”. She would have been the one swanning around, not the “intended one”.
I think that if one took the job description seriously, there was work to be done.
However, “call me Porky Barilaro” isn’t one to take those descriptions as anything as anything except a guide.
OIs it time to lament the death of the Australian vernacular? “…. a frat house for Liberal Party cronies all supported on the public dime.” Really? Is that the best you can do? Where is the editorial control at Crikey?
If I wanted americanisms spouted at me, I’d subscribe to a News Corp product.
Can I suggest that you cancel your on-line entertainment subscriptions and get out and about in Australian society a little.
Agreed. So what word or phrase in Australian culture brings to mind a collection of feckless, reckless, lazy, arrogant, entitled, super-privileged parasites whooping it up like there’s no tomorrow and wrecking everything they can get their hands on, leaving a diabolical mess that will take years to clear up at very great cost? “A federal Liberal cabinet” maybe?
“Beer & prawns on the mug punter’s quid“?
Footy club. Rugby league club?
I was similarly taken aback by ‘Frat house’ description.
I’m really sick of the Valley Girl vocabulary of the Worm editor – just in the last week we’ve “(they) were, like” x 4 and 3 ‘yikes‘.
…the remaining councillors were like, what do we do now?
…people in the sector were like, que?
…and the Queensland Greens were like, c’mon man.
…Leaders from NSW, Vic, Qld, Tas and the ACT were all like, what?
…stripped of the role prior last year because it was “a present for someone”… big yikes.
I think you’ve possibly left it a bit late to object to Americanisms being spouted at you. It’s happening everywhere and not just chez the News Corp products.Crikey has a pretty good vocabulary.
Words almost fail me. What everybody is still staying schtum about is why West was sacked from her previous job. Was there an attempt to gag her and she did not play ball? We (and she) deserve to know.
See my comment above. This was made clear by one of the Opposition MPs who was participating at the inquiry earlier this week. I watched the live stream and was wondering the same as you until I heard that.
I reckon Amy Brown has a lot of explaining to do, and to reveal, rather than covering for Berejiklian, Perrottet and maybe Ayres too. I also wonder what Michael Coutts-Trotter knew and when.
There is so much that reeks of conspiracy in this issue, which is a clear corruption of process, that I can’t see how ICAC can justify not holding an inquisition.
My guess is it’s really simple. Once they’s shafted her about the NY gig it would have been crazy-optimistic to think she would just suck it up and carry on like nothing happened with all working relations the same as before. A few hundred years ago Machiavelli advised it is a blunder to injure somebody unless you make it impossible for them to hit back. So she had to go. Their mistake was not seeing there would be this inquiry where she would be obliged to give evidence.
I wonder if there would have been an inquiry at all if NSW wasn’t heading to a state election and people weren’t so fed up with toxic politics?