Yes campaigns for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament are outperforming the No opposition on social media as both sides begin targetting voters ahead of this year’s referendum.
With voters already making up their minds prior to the referendum — expected to take place between October and December — campaigns have already spent this year reaching undecided voters, firming up support, and winning over opponents.
Much of the discourse is being fought by individual politicians, parties and groups, but dedicated Voice campaigns are leading the charge.
Despite having 10 times fewer followers, ADVANCE’s No campaign Fair Australia and the Warren Mundine-led Recognise A Better Way slightly edge out the high-profile Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition’s Yes23 and Uluru Statement from the Heart’s campaigns, when measured by the number of engagements using social media analysis tool CrowdTangle.
These No campaigns have racked up more than 61,000 engagements compared with the Yes campaign’s 57,000 engagements in the past three months. Measuring engagements (which includes likes, comments and shares) is a rough proxy for the number of views and a direct measure of how involved followers are with the page.
But this very slight advantage is significantly outweighed by the Yes campaign’s dominance on Instagram, where the No campaigns lack accounts. The Yes23 and Uluru Statement from the Heart’s accounts have had more than 88,000 engagements over the past three months. The only campaign to have a TikTok account is the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which has garnered 24,000 likes and grown its audience to 3200 followers since it launched.
Two campaigns have already begun supplementing their organic posts with paid advertising, according to Meta’s political ad library.
Yes23 has spent the most over the past 90 days, outlaying up to $26,000 to reach 2.8 million Facebook and Instagram users. The campaign’s advertising has primarily focused on people aged under 45 living in capital cities other than Darwin. They’ve also specifically targeted people on Facebook with interests such as volunteering, Indigenous art, charity and political-related topics, as well as people with post-secondary education.
Over the same period, more than $18,000 has been spent promoting Fair Australia’s case against the Voice to Parliament. It has specifically targeted some of its posts at residents of Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia, as well as at voters over 30.
While the audiences of these campaigns so far pale in comparison to the social media reach of established figures and groups who’ve taken sides on the debate (which may tilt in favour of the No campaign), the organised side pushing for the Voice to Parliament appears to have an early head start on those who oppose.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.