Coalition supporters, searching for reasons why a government that they think is just the bee’s knees should be headed for mammoth defeat, often seize on the “It’s time” factor: the idea that length of time in office, independent of other causes, provides a reason for people to vote against a government.
It’s a popular idea among commentators. Peter Brent, for example, argues that “young governments find re-election easy, while old ones find it increasingly difficult.” But is it true?
Well, let’s look at some numbers. By my count there have been 230 elections, state and federal, since the establishment of our two-party system in 1909. The following table summarises the results according to how long the government of the time had been in office.
Labor governments | Non-Labor governments | Total | |||||||
Re-elected | Defeated | % | Re-elected | Defeated | % | Re-elected | Defeated | % | |
One term | 25 | 15 | 63% | 31 | 18 | 63% | 56 | 33 | 63% |
Two terms | 16 | 5 | 76% | 19 | 10 | 66% | 35 | 15 | 70% |
Three terms | 10 | 5 | 67% | 11 | 8 | 58% | 21 | 13 | 62% |
Four terms | 5 | 3 | 63% | 6 | 2 | 75% | 11 | 5 | 69% |
Five terms | 3 | 2 | 60% | 4 | 1 | 80% | 7 | 3 | 70% |
Six or more terms | 9 | 3 | 75% | 15 | 4 | 79% | 24 | 7 | 77% |
Total | 68 | 33 | 67% | 86 | 43 | 67% | 154 | 76 | 67% |
In other words, over the last century governments have about two chances in three of being re-elected, and that’s pretty much independent of which party they are and how long they’ve been in office. (I haven’t bothered with the figures here, but it also doesn’t vary much by
jurisdiction.)
But there is one interesting variation: the picture seems to have changed over time. Here are the figures again, this time divided into three roughly equal periods.
1909-1941 | 1942-1973 | 1973-2007 | |||||||
Re-elected | Defeated | % | Re-elected | Defeated | % | Re-elected | Defeated | % | |
One term | 22 | 22 | 50% | 10 | 7 | 59% | 24 | 4 | 86% |
Two terms | 12 | 5 | 71% | 9 | 2 | 82% | 14 | 8 | 64% |
Three terms | 4 | 6 | 40% | 11 | 1 | 92% | 6 | 6 | 50% |
Four terms | 3 | 0 | 100% | 7 | 2 | 78% | 1 | 3 | 25% |
Five or more terms | 0 | 2 | 0% | 22 | 5 | 81% | 9 | 3 | 75% |
Total | 41 | 35 | 54% | 59 | 17 | 78% | 54 | 24 | 69% |
So the electorate was less tolerant of governments in the early period, became much more so in the mid-twentieth century, and a bit less tolerant again in recent years. But in the recent period the re-election rate for first-term governments has shot right up, while the others have all dropped.
In the last few decades it seems true to say that second-term governments have a tougher task than first-term ones, and third- and fourth-term governments tougher again. Beyond that, however, the picture is murkier, and the sample sizes are too small to be confident about drawing conclusions.
It looks as if recent history gives some support to the “It’s time” theory, but it is probably still best to treat it as a conjecture rather than an established truth.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.